The Rise of Alpha Male Feminists (The "Redpill" Community)
The Table...what does she bring to it?
I feel for bad for zoomers because they’re often lied to by bitter millennials — divorced dads, married men who became their wife’s slave, or men who just don’t attract women anymore.
There’s no better example of this than the ‘Whatever’ podcast — a show hosted by closet homosexuals in their 30’s and 40’s who scold women for not acting like men.
Modern men have become so indoctrinated by feminist propaganda that they’ve internalized the idea that “anything a man can do, a woman can do better.” They eventually realize this idea conflicts with reality, then they scold women for not living up to the hype. They notice women are different from men, then get angry they were sold a fake bill of goods.
You’ve likely seen posts from the ‘manosphere’ telling men to ask themselves: “What does she bring to the table?”
These questions belong in job interviews, HR meetings, and management training seminars — not relationships.
Relationships Are Not Competitions
If the thought of asking a girl about her “life goals” on a first date makes my dick shrivel into my stomach, then imagine what it does to a girl’s pussy
The redpill community often talks about “The Table.”
“What does she bring to The Table?”
“What do I bring to The Table?”
“I do X Y and Z…so what does she do for me?”
Sizing up the opposite sex based on their potential benefits to you reveals a fundamental belief that men and women are equal.
“These heroic and all-powerful goddesses better bring home the bacon just as much as I do. Otherwise — that’s not fair!”
This transactional and childish model of the opposite sex causes men to approach women with a competitive mindset.
Men are supposed to cultivate qualities that signal strength, reliability and intelligence. Character is what women primarily select for. Men primarily select for beauty.
But of course — feminist propaganda doesn’t allow for that, because that would mean men are objectifying women.
Feminist propaganda is so embedded into the redpill community that these men don’t just expect women to act like men, but they expect women to think and select like men too.
Corporate HR-Speak
The way “life goals” is used in the modern world rubs me the wrong way. On interviews you’re sometimes asked “Where do you see yourself in 3-5 years?”
The honest answer is something along the lines of: “I don’t know, asshole. I just want more money. I want a hot girlfriend. What do you care? You would lay me off tomorrow if you had to cut costs. How about asking me something that relates to the job?” But if you said anything remotely close to the truth, you’d be laughed out of the room.
But let’s say you were to answer the question in a smarter and more professional way.
“Well, I’m applying for the Manager position. I’m hoping that within a year I’ll have proved myself to be promoted to Director. If I can prove to the company that I can handle that level of responsibility, I’d like to become VP and run my own division. In my personal life, I’m saving up to purchase a home. After that I’d like to find a wife, settle down to marry and have children.”
The hiring manger subconsciously thinks to himself: “What a good boy! What a safe little consumer. Nothing was said outside of the box and nothing was unpredictable. He’s got a good head on his shoulders. He’s on the straight and narrow. He’s a normal, well-to-do tax payer. Very good. Onto the next question.”
The question reeks of superficiality. Any question that demands a lie as an answer isn’t a question, it’s a test. In this case, it’s a test to see if the person being interviewed is ambitious enough to blend into the slavish conditions of a corporate office.
The language of corporate HR-speak fuels conversations that drain souls. Given American culture has become HR-Approved for decades now, it isn’t surprising that so many men apply these questions to women.
It’s good for men to have long-term plans, to know what they want, and to have a plan for making more money over time. But expecting women to have “life goals” in the same vein implies a lack of understanding of female nature. It also implies they’ve been cucked by feminist propaganda.
And yet — they think they’re being masculine by demanding women “bring something to the table.” This is why I call them Alpha Male Feminists.
Proper Misogyny
I’m a misogynist. That means I understand, and more importantly, accept, female nature. Understanding female nature implies an understanding of male nature, otherwise we’d just be talking about human nature (a communist concept that does more harm than good).
Men and women are entirely separate beings and should be thought of as such.
Before I keep going, I’m going to warn you that I’m about to use the word ideally a lot.
Ideally, women don’t have to work. Ideally, a man can earn a sufficient income to the point where he can afford a home, provide for his wife, his children, and himself. Ideally, we live an economy that allows for that. Ideally, we don’t flood the country with immigrants for cheap labor. Ideally, citizens can easily find good work for good pay. Ideally, we have a currency that can’t be inflated out of thin air so the government can start wars. Get what I’m driving at?
We used to live in a more ideal world, but we don’t anymore. And life would be meaningless if we didn’t strive for it. Therefore, men should aim to make enough money to be able to provide. If he can’t, that’s his problem. Putting the burden on a girl to cover the life you cannot afford doesnt make sense because it isn’t in her nature to provide. It’s in male nature to provide.
Some say it’s misogynistic to think this way. I think it just reflects a basic understanding of biology. Men are hunters.
Unless, of course, you believe that women should bring home the bacon or at least contribute. Because women can do anything that men can do, right? You “Believe Women”, don’t you?
Men who believe this are Alpha Male Feminists — Male Feminists who try to be Alpha.
How to spot an Alpha Male Feminist
The Alpha Male Feminist is petrified of women destroying their lives. They believe that all women are strong, brave, vicious, and all-powerful gold diggers who want nothing more than to dump a man the second he loses a strand of hair for the wealthier better-looking chad and then take all of his money in divorce court.
What these men don’t realize they’re is they’re subscribing to the most annoying and harpy kind of feminism of the late 90’s and late 2010’s —“I don’t need no man” feminism. “Believe Women” feminism. They’ve completely absorbed it subconsciously simply by being a man raised in the matriarchy that is America. The most generous explanation is they’re simply a product of their environment. They were lied to, and now they’re very frustrated to learn that women are not, in fact, men.
And look — I’m not saying men shouldn’t sometimes be skeptical about a girl’s intentions when red flags arise. But who are we talking about here exactly? Are these guys trust fund kids? Do they have $100M in liquid assets they need to protect? Or do they still live at home with their moms? Are they just some guy? Based on American financial data, there’s a high probability there isn’t much to take in the first place.
You will often find AMFs being Angry Online. They “hate women.” They spend a lot of time pointing out the multitude of discrepancies between what girls say and what girls do. They think they’ve made the grand discovery that women sometimes contradict themselves. This apparently is Very Based and Very Alpha. If only their great great grandfathers could have received this rare gem of wisdom!
“Girls will tell you what they don’t like in a man then cheat on you with that exact type of man.”
Oh my! A girl who isn’t logically consistent? There must be something in the tampons! *clutches pearls* How could this possibly be!?
You will also find AMF’s accusing girls of being superficial. A lot of this comes from the incel community, who, to their own peril, believe that girls are not only supposed to be just like men, but that girls have the same perceptual framework as men. They truly believe that girls prioritize looks just as much as men do when in fact, as I said earlier — girls prioritize character, charisma and potential over looks. Of course men’s looks matter to some extent, but not nearly as much as a girl’s looks matter to men.
AMF’s also believe in holding women accountable. Oh boy! The Great Female Tribunal — “Once and for all, we’ll show these harlots the errors of their ways. Every last one of them! Then it will be just us…just the boys…alone…forever 😏”
I’m not claiming they’re all gay, but I do believe your perception of the opposite sex and your own sexuality can become so stunted that you essentially become asexual.
Anti-Intimacy Culture
The issue here is less about the cringe discourse and more about how this way of thinking worsens a culture that is already devoid of any passion and intimacy. Men who approach women with the assumption they’re out to get them will never be vulnerable, which means they will never actually connect. They will never trust, and they will never have any relationship worth producing offspring. Because couples who get married for the wrong reasons end up in affairs or divorced, the children grow up fucked up, and the cycle continues. Nothing improves.
Men who are petrified of girls put themselves in a powerless position and ultimately see themselves as victims, or potential/future victims. This makes men and women even more at odds with each other. Men manifest their own misery, girls remain unsatisfied, and the world becomes more insufferable.
Until men realize that they do, and always will, have the upper hand with girls, and begin to tap into in their own autonomy — then they’re going to be stuck in a cycle of cringe for the rest of their lives. Men need to drop this fearful way of thinking completely.







More articles like this, thanks. I can see how RP ideology made me frustratedly asexual. That frustration has led to evolution of character and desire to level up. But it’s good to see some how putting the blame on women only holds me back
It’s crazy how confusing all this is when it’s actually super simple.